In a recent post, I discuss how my dislike of a scientist complicates my judgment of his or her work. I call this complication “the Gould effect,” because it came into play when I interviewed Stephen Jay Gould in 1995. I profiled Gould, who died in 2002, in Scientific American in 1995 and at greater length in my book The End of Science, which was re-published this year. Below is an edited version of the latter profile, titled “Gould’s Contingency Plan.” – John Horgan
What Do You Think Of That Genius?
You Might Also Be Interested In

Anna Comnena’s Alexiad as a source for the Second Crusade?

Scaliger and the Science of Chronology

Herodotus and the Invention of History

Thomas Macaulay won the debate on how to shape Indian education. So who were the losers?

Thomas Babington Macaulay: Extraordinary Eloquence for Liberty

Polybius as A Historian

Rome, Through the Eyes of Flavius Josephus

We Are Not Done With Abolition

The Infamous Macaulay Speech That Never Was

Edward Gibbon, Enlightenment historian of religion

THE VIETNAM SYNDROME

Oswald Spengler, Technology, and Human Nature
People Who Read This Article Also Read About...

The Rise and Fall of Nikola Tesla and his Tower

ATHANASIUS KIRCHER. ARCA MUSARITHMICA AND MANY SOUND DEVICES

CONTRE SAINT-BEUVE

Niccolò Paganini was such a gifted violinist, people thought he sold his soul to the devil

Hero of Alexandria Changed the World with this Invention Much Earlier than Many Thought

A Rapper Finds His Muse in the Stars

Robert Bunsen did a whole lot more than invent the Bunsen burner

Another Ovation for Joachim

The timeless allure of Chekhov

How Claudio Arrau Nearly Became Glenn Gould

What became of Ruth Lawrence, Britain's most famous prodigy?

Charles Darwin’s hunch about early life was probably right