Thomas Aquinas vs William Shakespeare
Thomas Aquinas (IQ 170) vs William Shakespeare (IQ 190). Side-by-side comparison of intellect, achievements, era and cultural impact.
| Born | 1225 | 1564 |
|---|---|---|
| Died | 1274 | 1616 |
| Country | IT | GB |
| Estimated IQ | 170 | 190 |
| Best known for | Romeo and Juliet, Macbeth, King Lyr |
Who had the higher IQ?
By the most cited estimates, William Shakespeare tops this matchup with an estimated IQ of 190, a 20-point margin over Thomas Aquinas (170). IQ estimates for historical figures are reconstructions, not test results — they sit on top of biographical evidence, productivity, and the difficulty of the problems each person solved. Treat the number as a directional signal, not a verdict.
Achievements compared
Thomas Aquinas is best known for: — William Shakespeare is best known for: Romeo and Juliet, Macbeth, King Lyr
Different eras, different boards
The two were born roughly 339 years apart (1225 vs 1564), which matters: scientific tools, available knowledge, and intellectual culture compound. Comparing minds across eras is comparing players on different boards.
The verdict
So who was greater? The honest answer: they're not strictly comparable. By raw IQ proxy, William Shakespeare edges out. By measurable, lasting influence in their respective field, both are anchors of the human record. If you have to pick one to bet civilization on, pick the one working on the problem you care about.