Linus Pauling vs Michael Faraday
Linus Pauling (IQ 190) vs Michael Faraday (IQ 175). Side-by-side comparison of intellect, achievements, era and cultural impact.
| Born | 1901 | 1791 |
|---|---|---|
| Died | 1994 | 1867 |
| Country | US | ENG |
| Estimated IQ | 190 | 175 |
| Best known for | Alpha sheet • Ancestral sequence reconstruction • Backbonding • Beta sheet • Bond order | Faraday's law of induction • Faraday effect • Faraday cage • Faraday constant • Faraday cup • Faraday's laws of electrolysis • Faraday's ice pail experiment • Faraday paradox |
Who had the higher IQ?
By the most cited estimates, Linus Pauling tops this matchup with an estimated IQ of 190, a 15-point margin over Michael Faraday (175). IQ estimates for historical figures are reconstructions, not test results — they sit on top of biographical evidence, productivity, and the difficulty of the problems each person solved. Treat the number as a directional signal, not a verdict.
Achievements compared
Linus Pauling is best known for: Alpha sheet • Ancestral sequence reconstruction • Backbonding • Beta sheet • Bond order Michael Faraday is best known for: Faraday's law of induction • Faraday effect • Faraday cage • Faraday constant • Faraday cup • Faraday's laws of electrolysis • Faraday's ice pail experiment • Faraday paradox
Recognition. Linus Pauling: ACS Award in Pure Chemistry (1931) • Irving Langmuir Award (1931) • Member of the National Academy of Sciences (1933) • Davy Medal (1947) • Nobel Prize in Chemistry (1954) • Nobel Peace Prize (1962) • Roebling Medal (1967) • Lenin Peace Prize (1968–69) • National Medal of Science (1974) • Lomonosov . Michael Faraday: Royal Medal (1835 and 1846) • Copley Medal (1832 and 1838) • Rumford Medal (1846) • Albert Medal (1866).
Different eras, different boards
The two were born roughly 110 years apart (1901 vs 1791), which matters: scientific tools, available knowledge, and intellectual culture compound. Comparing minds across eras is comparing players on different boards.
The verdict
So who was greater? The honest answer: they're not strictly comparable. By raw IQ proxy, Linus Pauling edges out. By measurable, lasting influence in their respective field, both are anchors of the human record. If you have to pick one to bet civilization on, pick the one working on the problem you care about.