Peter van Inwagen, born in 1942, established a significant presence in contemporary metaphysics and the philosophy of action. His analytical work addresses the complexities of free will, the nature of material objects, and the intersection of Christian theology with modern philosophy. A central figure in these fields, he has held appointments at various American universities.
Academic Trajectory
He completed his doctoral studies at the University of Rochester in 1969 under the supervision of Richard Clyde Taylor. His professional career included teaching positions at Syracuse University and the University of Notre Dame, where he became the John Cardinal O'Hara Professor of Philosophy. Additionally, he served as a research professor of philosophy at Duke University. Throughout his career, he has engaged with academic communities globally, delivering series such as the 2003 Gifford Lectures at the University of St. Andrews and the 2000 Wilde Lectures at Oxford University.
Twenty questions, eight minutes on the clock, and a percentile measured against everyone who has taken it. No sign-up.
Take the IQ test →Incompatibilism and Free Will
His 1983 monograph, An Essay on Free Will, was influential in the study of libertarianism. Within this text, he defined incompatibilism as the view that free will cannot coexist with determinism. He introduced the consequence argument, which posits that if determinism is accurate, current human actions are merely results of past events and immutable laws of nature. He later contrasted this with the Mind argument, suggesting that if human actions are not determined, they may instead be governed by random chance, rendering free will equally problematic.
Ontological Views
In his work Material Beings, he proposed a theory of mereological nihilism. He argued that the only existing composite material objects are living organisms. According to this perspective, everyday items like furniture or vehicles do not exist as singular objects; instead, they represent collections of elementary particles arranged in specific ways. He compared this arrangement to a swarm of bees, noting that while the particles appear stable, they lack the unification found in living entities.
Philosophy and Religion
A convert to Anglicanism, he has explored questions concerning resurrection and the physical continuity of the human person after death. His research into the problem of evil, notably in his Gifford Lectures, examines the logical limits of philosophical arguments regarding the existence of divinity. He served as president of the Society of Christian Philosophers between 2010 and 2013 and has addressed themes of faith alongside his secular metaphysical inquiries.
Fast facts
- Born: 1942, United States
- Education: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, University of Rochester
- Primary Fields: Metaphysics, Philosophy of Religion, Philosophy of Action
- Notable Membership: American Academy of Arts and Sciences
- Academic Appointments: University of Notre Dame, Duke University, Syracuse University
- Religious Affiliation: Anglicanism
- Key Publication: An Essay on Free Will (1983)
- Residence: Granger, Indiana
Questions readers ask
Do everyday objects like tables and chairs exist according to Peter van Inwagen?
No. He argues that only elementary particles and living organisms exist, with everyday objects being merely collections of particles arranged in a specific manner.
What is the consequence argument?
It is an argument stating that if determinism is true, human actions are the inevitable results of past events and the laws of nature, neither of which are under our control.
Achievements
- Held posts at University of Notre Dame, Syracuse University and Duke University
